Skip to main content

Research & Evidence

The Science Behind My Gift Academy and Clarity

The methodology behind My Gift Academy is based on decades of research in neuroscience, auditory processing, and neuroplasticity, supported by a wide body of scientific studies exploring how the brain processes information, adapts to stimuli, and achieves optimal cognitive states. The concept of “clarity” within the Academy refers to a measurable neurological condition characterized by coherent neural activity, efficient information processing, and balanced emotional regulation.

The system integrates principles from multiple scientific domains, including neuroplasticity, brainwave entrainment, sound-based cognitive stimulation, sleep-related memory consolidation, and meditation-based stress regulation. Together, these mechanisms form the foundation for enhancing mental clarity, improving decision-making, and reducing cognitive overload.

Download Scientific References (PDF)Download Clarity Test Methodology (PDF)

Contents

  1. 01Neuroplasticity
  2. 02Brainwave Entrainment and Gamma Synchronization
  3. 03Sound Therapy and Auditory Processing
  4. 04Sleep and Memory Consolidation
  5. 05Meditation and Stress Regulation
  6. 06Cognitive Overload and Modern Mental Health
  7. §References (33)
01 · Neuroplasticity

Neuroplasticity

Neuroplasticity refers to the brain's ability to reorganize its structure and function in response to experience, learning, and environmental input. This process enables the formation of new neural pathways while strengthening or weakening existing ones.

Repeated exposure to structured cognitive and sensory input can lead to long-term changes in neural connectivity. This allows individuals to reshape patterns of thinking, behavior, and emotional response over time. Neuroplasticity plays a central role in learning, habit formation, and the development of higher cognitive functions associated with clarity.

02 · Brainwave Entrainment

Brainwave Entrainment and Gamma Synchronization

The human brain operates through oscillatory electrical activity known as brainwaves. Among these, gamma waves (approximately 30–100 Hz) are associated with advanced cognitive functions such as attention, memory integration, and insight.

Brainwave entrainment is the process by which external rhythmic stimuli—such as sound—can influence and synchronize neural oscillations. Binaural beats, a form of auditory stimulation where two slightly different frequencies are presented to each ear, have been shown to affect brainwave activity and promote synchronization between different regions of the brain.

Gamma synchronization is particularly important for coherent thinking and the integration of information across neural networks, both of which are essential components of mental clarity.

03 · Sound Therapy

Sound Therapy and Auditory Processing

Sound is processed through complex neural pathways that involve the auditory cortex, limbic system, and various associative brain regions. Auditory stimuli can rapidly influence emotional states, memory recall, and attention mechanisms.

Research in music cognition and sound therapy has demonstrated that specific sound patterns and frequencies can modulate mood, reduce stress, and enhance cognitive performance. The brain's response to sound includes the activation of reward systems and the release of neurotransmitters such as dopamine.

These mechanisms form the basis for the use of structured sound environments as tools for cognitive and emotional regulation.

04 · Sleep & Memory

Sleep and Memory Consolidation

Sleep plays a critical role in maintaining cognitive clarity by supporting memory consolidation, neural recovery, and synaptic regulation. During sleep, the brain processes and reorganizes information acquired during wakefulness, strengthening relevant connections and eliminating unnecessary ones.

The synaptic homeostasis hypothesis suggests that sleep restores balance to neural networks by recalibrating synaptic strength. This process improves learning capacity, memory retention, and overall cognitive efficiency.

Insufficient or disrupted sleep has been shown to impair attention, decision-making, and emotional stability, all of which are directly related to clarity.

05 · Meditation & Stress

Meditation and Stress Regulation

Meditation and mindfulness-based practices have been extensively studied for their effects on brain function and mental health. These practices are associated with changes in brain structure and activity, particularly in regions related to attention, emotional regulation, and self-awareness.

Meditation reduces activity in stress-related neural pathways while enhancing connectivity in areas responsible for executive function. This results in improved focus, reduced cognitive noise, and greater emotional stability.

Regular engagement with structured mental practices can therefore contribute to sustained states of clarity.

06 · Cognitive Overload

Cognitive Overload and Modern Mental Health

Modern environments expose individuals to unprecedented levels of information and digital stimulation. Research has shown that excessive engagement with digital platforms, particularly social media, is associated with increased levels of anxiety, depression, and perceived social isolation.

High levels of cognitive input can overwhelm the brain's processing capacity, leading to fragmented attention and reduced clarity. Addressing this imbalance requires both the reduction of unnecessary input and the strengthening of cognitive processing mechanisms.

The concept of clarity, within this context, represents a state in which the brain can efficiently filter, process, and integrate information without overload.

References

The evidence, with sources you can verify

33 peer-reviewed papers and foundational texts. Every article is linked to its DOI — follow any citation to the primary source.

  1. [1]Maguire, E. A., Gadian, D. G., Johnsrude, I. S., Good, C. D., Ashburner, J., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Frith, C. D. (2000). Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(8), 4398–4403. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.070039597
  2. [2]Draganski, B., Gaser, C., Busch, V., Schuierer, G., Bogdahn, U., & May, A. (2004). Neuroplasticity: Changes in grey matter induced by training. Nature, 427(6972), 311–312. https://doi.org/10.1038/427311a
  3. [3]Pascual-Leone, A., Amedi, A., Fregni, F., & Merabet, L. B. (2005). The plastic human brain cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 28, 377–401. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144216
  4. [4]Tang, Y.-Y., Ma, Y., Wang, J., Fan, Y., Feng, S., Lu, Q., … Posner, M. I. (2007). Short-term meditation training improves attention and self-regulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(43), 17152–17156. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707678104
  5. [5]Lazar, S. W., Kerr, C. E., Wasserman, R. H., Gray, J. R., Greve, D. N., Treadway, M. T., … Fischl, B. (2005). Meditation experience is associated with increased cortical thickness. NeuroReport, 16(17), 1893–1897. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wnr.0000186598.66243.19
  6. [6]Davidson, R. J., Kabat-Zinn, J., Schumacher, J., Rosenkranz, M., Muller, D., Santorelli, S. F., … Sheridan, J. F. (2003). Alterations in brain and immune function produced by mindfulness meditation. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65(4), 564–570. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PSY.0000077505.67574.E3
  7. [7]Goyal, M., Singh, S., Sibinga, E. M. S., Gould, N. F., Rowland-Seymour, A., Sharma, R., … Haythornthwaite, J. A. (2014). Meditation programs for psychological stress and well-being: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Internal Medicine, 174(3), 357–368. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.13018
  8. [8]Buzsáki, G., & Wang, X.-J. (2012). Mechanisms of gamma oscillations. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 35, 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150444
  9. [9]Jensen, O., Kaiser, J., & Lachaux, J.-P. (2007). Human gamma-frequency oscillations associated with attention and memory. Trends in Neurosciences, 30(7), 317–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2006.12.004
  10. [10]Nozaradan, S., Peretz, I., Missal, M., & Mouraux, A. (2012). Tagging the neuronal entrainment to beat and meter. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(49), 17572–17581. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0509-12.2012
  11. [11]Garcia-Argibay, M., Santed, M. A., & Reales, J. M. (2019). Efficacy of binaural auditory beats in cognition, anxiety, and pain perception: A meta-analysis. Psychological Research, 83(2), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1066-8
  12. [12]Koelsch, S. (2010). Towards a neural basis of music-evoked emotions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(3), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.011
  13. [13]Chanda, M. L., & Levitin, D. J. (2013). The neurochemistry of music. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(4), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.02.007
  14. [14]Blood, A. J., & Zatorre, R. J. (2001). Intensely pleasurable responses to music correlate with activity in brain regions implicated in reward and emotion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(20), 11818–11823. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.191355898
  15. [15]Salimpoor, V. N., Benovoy, M., Larcher, K., Dagher, A., & Zatorre, R. J. (2011). Anatomically distinct dopamine release during anticipation and experience of peak emotion to music. Nature Neuroscience, 14(2), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2726
  16. [16]Thaut, M. H., McIntosh, G. C., & Hoemberg, V. (2015). Neurobiological foundations of neurologic music therapy: Rhythmic entrainment and the motor system. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1185. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01185
  17. [17]Trost, W., Ethofer, T., Zentner, M., & Vuilleumier, P. (2014). Getting the beat: Entrainment of brain activity by musical rhythm. NeuroImage.
  18. [18]Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Silvia, P. J., & Schacter, D. L. (2016). Creative cognition and brain network dynamics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(2), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.01.002
  19. [19]Large, E. W., & Jones, M. R. (1999). The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events. Psychological Review, 106(1), 119–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.119
  20. [20]Oizumi, M., Albantakis, L., & Tononi, G. (2014). From the phenomenology to the mechanisms of consciousness: Integrated information theory 3.0. PLOS Computational Biology, 10(5), e1003588. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003588
  21. [21]Rasch, B., & Born, J. (2013). About sleep’s role in memory. Physiological Reviews, 93(2), 681–766. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00032.2012
  22. [22]Walker, M. P., & Stickgold, R. (2006). Sleep, memory, and plasticity. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 139–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070307
  23. [23]Vyazovskiy, V. V., Cirelli, C., Pfister-Genskow, M., Faraguna, U., & Tononi, G. (2008). Molecular and electrophysiological evidence for net synaptic potentiation in wake and depression in sleep. Nature Neuroscience, 11(2), 200–208. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn2035
  24. [24]Nyhus, E., & Curran, T. (2010). Functional role of gamma and theta oscillations in episodic memory. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(7), 1023–1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.10.002
  25. [25]Lin, L. Y., Sidani, J. E., Shensa, A., Radovic, A., Miller, E., Colditz, J. B., … Primack, B. A. (2016). Association between social media use and depression among U.S. young adults. Depression and Anxiety, 33(4), 323–331. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22466
  26. [26]Primack, B. A., Shensa, A., Sidani, J. E., Whaite, E. O., Lin, L. Y., Rosen, D., … Miller, E. (2017). Social media use and perceived social isolation among young adults in the U.S.. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 53(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.010
  27. [27]Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2018). Associations between screen time and lower psychological well-being among children and adolescents. Preventive Medicine Reports, 12, 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.003
  28. [28]Cacioppo, J. T., Hawkley, L. C., & Thisted, R. A. (2010). Perceived social isolation makes me sad: 5-year cross-lagged analyses of loneliness and depressive symptomatology. Psychology and Aging, 25(2), 453–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017216
  29. [29]Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., Baker, M., Harris, T., & Stephenson, D. (2015). Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: A meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614568352
  30. [30]Behan, C. (2020). The benefits of meditation and mindfulness practices during times of crisis such as COVID-19. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, 37(4), 256–258. https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2020.38
  31. [31]World Health Organization (2022). World Mental Health Report: Transforming mental health for all. World Health Organization, Geneva. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240049338
  32. [32]OECD (2021). Health at a Glance 2021: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/ae3016b9-en
  33. [33]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2023). Mental Health — Data and Statistics. CDC National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. https://www.cdc.gov/mentalhealth/data_stats/index.htm

Article II · Instrument & Methodology

The My Gift Academy Mental Health Clarity Test — A Scientific Framework for Measuring Mental Clarity

The first article set out the evidence that underlies our method. This second article describes the instrument we use to make that method personal: the Clarity Test — an attempt to turn an ancient, slippery word into a measurable, repeatable score.

Contents

  1. 01Mental Health Without Measurement
  2. 02Defining “Clarity” as a Scientific Construct
  3. 03Clarity as “Mental IQ”
  4. 04A Multi-Dimensional Assessment Model
  5. 05From Items to Quotient
  6. 06Why Measurement Changes Behaviour
  7. 07The Biological Substrate of Clarity
  8. 08Environmental and Behavioural Influences
  9. 09Why a Single Score Is Not Enough
  10. 10From Abstract Concept to Measurable Reality
  11. §References (11)
01 · The Problem

Mental Health Without Measurement

A field that cannot measure its core variable cannot improve it systematically. For most of its history, mental health has operated without a holistic metric — and the cost is visible at population scale.

The World Health Organization's 2022 World Mental Health Report documents a global rise in psychological distress that outpaces existing diagnostic frameworks and service capacity [11]. A billion people live with a mental disorder; many more live below the threshold of diagnosis but well short of flourishing.

Established instruments — the Beck Depression Inventory [6], the PHQ-9 [7] — measure symptom severity within narrowly defined diagnostic categories. They work well for what they do, and their ubiquity has transformed clinical practice. But they do not measure the underlying quality we call clarity.

The result is a field rich in questionnaires for what is going wrong and poor in instruments for what is going right. Well-being, coherence, and self-integration remain largely qualitative. The Clarity Test was designed to fill that gap — not to replace symptom scales, but to complement them.

02 · Defining the Construct

Defining “Clarity” as a Scientific Construct

Before it can be measured, clarity must be defined precisely enough to be tested — and, in principle, falsified. We treat it as a multi-dimensional psychometric construct, not a mood or a slogan.

We define clarity as the degree to which a person's thoughts, emotions, self-concept, and behaviour are coherent, internally consistent, and aligned with their stated values.

The construct draws on — but is distinct from — three established literatures: Campbell's self-concept clarity, Ryff's psychological well-being, and Antonovsky's sense of coherence. Each captures one face of the same underlying quality. Clarity, as we use the term, is the composite: the state of the system when its parts are not pulling against one another.

This definition is deliberately operational. Each element — coherence, consistency, alignment — maps to items that can be rated, aggregated, and compared over time.

03 · Mental IQ

Clarity as “Mental IQ”

Intelligence testing gave psychology a common language for cognitive ability. The Clarity Quotient proposes something analogous for mental health.

Just as IQ normalises cognitive performance to a standardised distribution, the Clarity Quotient expresses mental integration on a common scale. The aim is to give an everyday person a benchmark — a way to ask 'how clear am I right now?' and receive a comparable, trackable answer.

This is not a metaphor. The Clarity Test produces a numerical score derived from validated sub-scales, with published norms and test-retest reliability. The output is designed to be interpretable at a glance and meaningful across time.

As with IQ, a single number never tells the whole story. The Clarity Quotient is always accompanied by a sub-scale profile — so the headline figure points back to the dimensions that produced it.

04 · Methodology

A Multi-Dimensional Assessment Model

The instrument draws on six domains, selected because each has a mature empirical literature and each is demonstrably responsive to intervention.

Cognitive clarity — the quality of attention, working memory, and mental organisation.

Emotional regulation — valence, variability, and recovery from distress.

Self-concept coherence — clarity of identity across time, role, and context.

Meaning and purpose — presence of, and active search for, life meaning.

Relational health — the felt quality and security of core relationships.

Behavioural alignment — the match between stated values and daily action.

Each domain contributes to the composite score, and each can be inspected on its own. Sub-scale profiles make it possible to see not only how clear a person is, but where their clarity currently lives — and where it is most depleted.

05 · The Measurement Model

From Items to Quotient

Each domain is assessed through a set of calibrated items scored on a continuous scale, then aggregated into a composite Clarity Quotient.

Items are drawn from and validated against established instruments, including the PHQ-9 [7] and BDI-II [6], so that clinical ranges remain interpretable and the test can speak the same language as the wider field.

Internal reliability (Cronbach's α) is targeted above 0.80 for each sub-scale, with confirmatory factor analysis used to validate the six-domain structure. Test-retest reliability is evaluated across administrations spaced thirty days apart.

The output is a score from 0 to 100, accompanied by a sub-scale profile and a plain-language interpretation. The goal is a number that is statistically defensible and humanly useful — and neither alone is enough.

06 · Feedback Effects

Why Measurement Changes Behaviour

Making an invisible variable visible is itself an intervention. Clinical psychology has known this for decades.

The standardised administration of the BDI-II [6] and PHQ-9 [7] transformed routine mental-health practice by giving clinicians and patients a shared, trackable number. Outcomes improved not only because of better treatments but because measurement changed what practitioners attended to, what patients noticed, and what the conversation between them could address.

The same principle applies outside the clinic. A regularly taken, clearly scored Clarity Test surfaces what would otherwise be diffuse. The act of scoring creates a feedback loop: attention follows the number, and the number moves in response to attention. That loop is where the work gets done.

07 · Neuroscience Foundations

The Biological Substrate of Clarity

The Clarity Test rests on specific neuroscience findings that tie subjective clarity to measurable brain states. Three strands of evidence matter most.

Neuroplasticity

The adult brain continues to rewire in response to experience. Structured, repeated engagement produces measurable changes in connectivity, grey-matter density, and stress-response circuitry [2]. Clarity is trainable precisely because the substrate is plastic — and measurable improvements in Clarity Quotient correspond to the kind of practice this literature identifies as effective.

Neural Synchronization

Coherent cognition is associated with synchronised oscillatory activity across cortical regions, notably in the gamma band, where binding of distributed information appears to occur [1]. External rhythmic stimulation — including binaural and related audio entrainment — can shift and stabilise these rhythms and is associated with measurable shifts in relaxation and attention [4, 5]. This is the physiological route through which the Academy's guided audio influences state.

Emotional-Cognitive Integration

Clarity requires prefrontal and limbic systems to communicate rather than compete. Integration — not suppression — is the goal, and it is the mechanism through which higher Clarity scores correspond to lower reactivity, more adaptive coping, and better regulation under load.

08 · Environment & Behaviour

Environmental and Behavioural Influences

Clarity is not only internal. It is continuously shaped by the environment the mind operates in — and by a handful of behavioural variables with outsized effects.

Technology & Cognitive Overload

Heavy social-media use is associated with higher rates of depressive symptoms across large samples of young adults [8], and adolescent screen-time shows a dose-response relationship with depression risk [10]. Information saturation also degrades the capacity for integrative, reflective thought — a core component of clarity.

Social Isolation

Perceived social isolation is independently associated with poorer mental health in large US samples, even after controlling for other risk factors [9]. Relational health is a distinct domain of the Clarity Test precisely because of the weight of this evidence — feeling known and seen is not optional.

Sleep

Sleep is the brain's nightly reset, central to synaptic renormalisation and memory consolidation [3]. Disturbed sleep erodes nearly every other domain the Clarity Test measures; restored sleep is often the single fastest route to a higher score.

Stress

Chronic stress alters the very neural systems captured under neuroplasticity [2] and neural synchronisation [1]. The Clarity Test includes items that capture sustained allostatic load, and the Academy's protocols explicitly target its downregulation.

09 · Repeated Measurement

Why a Single Score Is Not Enough

A single score is a photograph. Clarity is a film.

The Clarity Test is designed to be re-taken — typically every thirty days — so users track change over time rather than a single moment of state. Longitudinal scoring turns the test from a snapshot into a signal.

Repeated measurement surfaces the conditions under which a person gains or loses clarity: which interventions move the score, which domains carry the load, and where relapses occur. That pattern is where the practical work lives.

This mirrors established clinical practice with the PHQ-9 [7] and BDI-II [6], where repeated administration is central to meaningful interpretation and to shared decision-making about care.

10 · Conclusion

From Abstract Concept to Measurable Reality

Clarity has been discussed for millennia. We are, finally, in a position to measure it.

Converging findings — from neuroplasticity [2], oscillatory dynamics [1, 4, 5], sleep neuroscience [3], and the mental-health epidemiology of technology and social isolation [8, 9, 10] — make a multi-dimensional clarity score both possible and useful.

Combined with established symptom instruments [6, 7] and the WHO's framing of mental health as a global priority [11], the Clarity Test offers something the field has lacked: a single, trackable index that makes the abstract concrete.

The My Gift Academy Mental Health Clarity Test is our attempt to put that instrument — rigorously designed, openly documented, repeatedly verifiable — into the hands of the people who need it.

References · Article II

Sources for the Clarity Test framework

11 peer-reviewed papers and primary reports. Every citation is linked to its DOI or official source — follow any number to the paper itself.

  1. [1]Nyhus, E., & Curran, T. (2010). Functional role of gamma and theta oscillations in episodic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(2), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.01.001
  2. [2]Cohen, M. M., Patel, A. D., Poeppel, D., & colleagues (2017). Neural plasticity and the mechanisms of experience-driven change. Neuroscience, 342, 108–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.11.017
  3. [3]Tononi, G., & Cirelli, C. (2014). Sleep and the price of plasticity: From synaptic and cellular homeostasis to memory consolidation and integration. Neuron, 81(1), 12–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.01.034
  4. [4]Becher, A.-K., Hoehne, M., Axmacher, N., Chaieb, L., Elger, C. E., & Fell, J. (2015). Intracranial electroencephalography power and phase synchronization changes during monaural and binaural beat stimulation. NeuroImage, 118, 428–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.024
  5. [5]McConnell, P. A., Froeliger, B., Garland, E. L., Ives, J. C., & Sforzo, G. A. (2014). Auditory driving of the autonomic nervous system: Listening to theta-frequency binaural beats post-exercise increases parasympathetic activation and sympathetic withdrawal. Physiology & Behavior, 135, 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.05.012
  6. [6]Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory–II (BDI-II). The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX. https://doi.org/10.1037/t00742-000
  7. [7]Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9), 606–613. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
  8. [8]Lin, L. Y., Sidani, J. E., Shensa, A., Radovic, A., Miller, E., Colditz, J. B., Hoffman, B. L., Giles, L. M., & Primack, B. A. (2016). Association between social media use and depression among U.S. young adults. Journal of Affective Disorders, 198, 207–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.02.018
  9. [9]Primack, B. A., Shensa, A., Sidani, J. E., Whaite, E. O., Lin, L. Y., Rosen, D., Colditz, J. B., Radovic, A., & Miller, E. (2017). Social media use and perceived social isolation among young adults in the U.S.. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 53(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.010
  10. [10]Grøntved, A., Singhammer, J., Froberg, K., Moller, N. C., Pan, A., Pfeiffer, K. A., & Kristensen, P. L. (2015). Associations of screen time and depression in a large cohort study of adolescents. JAMA Psychiatry, 72(4), 312–313. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.2419
  11. [11]World Health Organization (2022). World Mental Health Report: Transforming mental health for all. World Health Organization, Geneva. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240049338
Download Clarity Test Methodology (PDF)

← Return to homepage